<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qute 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvid</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-29238</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-29238</guid>
		<description>Yes, coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, coming soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vel</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-29227</link>
		<dc:creator>Vel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-29227</guid>
		<description>Hi
Any chance of update for FF 3.6?

Thanks,
Vel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Any chance of update for FF 3.6?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Vel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hansen</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-27244</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-27244</guid>
		<description>Bummer, the patch didn&#039;t make it through intact.  The patch adds the following line to the rule starting at line 115 of global/toolbarbutton.css:

-moz-appearance: dualbutton;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer, the patch didn&#8217;t make it through intact.  The patch adds the following line to the rule starting at line 115 of global/toolbarbutton.css:</p>
<p>-moz-appearance: dualbutton;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hansen</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-27243</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-27243</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the theme, I really like it!  I prefer the heart over the star.

I have an issue to report, which I think is a bug but may be intentional:  the toolbar menu buttons look like a button nested inside a button.  This takes a lot of extra horizontal and vertical space.  Here&#039;s a proposed fix, which applies to global/toolbarbutton.css in chrome.jar:

--- global/toolbarbutton.css    2009-11-23 21:49:30.955221913 -0500
    global/toolbarbutton.css    2009-11-23 21:54:22.115217863 -0500
@@ -119,6  119,7 @@
 toolbarbutton[type=&quot;menu-button&quot;][disabled=&quot;true&quot;],
 toolbarbutton[type=&quot;menu-button&quot;][disabled=&quot;true&quot;]:hover,
 toolbarbutton[type=&quot;menu-button&quot;][disabled=&quot;true&quot;]:hover:active {
   -moz-appearance: dualbutton;
   border-style: none;
   padding: 0 !important;
 }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the theme, I really like it!  I prefer the heart over the star.</p>
<p>I have an issue to report, which I think is a bug but may be intentional:  the toolbar menu buttons look like a button nested inside a button.  This takes a lot of extra horizontal and vertical space.  Here&#8217;s a proposed fix, which applies to global/toolbarbutton.css in chrome.jar:</p>
<p>&#8212; global/toolbarbutton.css    2009-11-23 21:49:30.955221913 -0500<br />
    global/toolbarbutton.css    2009-11-23 21:54:22.115217863 -0500<br />
@@ -119,6  119,7 @@<br />
 toolbarbutton[type="menu-button"][disabled="true"],<br />
 toolbarbutton[type="menu-button"][disabled="true"]:hover,<br />
 toolbarbutton[type="menu-button"][disabled="true"]:hover:active {<br />
   -moz-appearance: dualbutton;<br />
   border-style: none;<br />
   padding: 0 !important;<br />
 }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-26893</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-26893</guid>
		<description>It is hard to read the words in white on a transparent background.
Dark text (gray) on clear background (without transparency) would be great.
I speak only of tabs and menu, of course!
I agree for favorites, star is better.
Otherwise, it&#039;s great ! It&#039;s the best one !
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to read the words in white on a transparent background.<br />
Dark text (gray) on clear background (without transparency) would be great.<br />
I speak only of tabs and menu, of course!<br />
I agree for favorites, star is better.<br />
Otherwise, it&#8217;s great ! It&#8217;s the best one !<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeepItSimpleEngineer</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-26227</link>
		<dc:creator>KeepItSimpleEngineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-26227</guid>
		<description>BINGO&lt; &amp; thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BINGO&lt; &amp; thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvid</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-26194</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-26194</guid>
		<description>KeepItSimpleEngineer: If you enable text labels the icons are different and obviously if you enable small icons too. Otherwise show a screenshot, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KeepItSimpleEngineer: If you enable text labels the icons are different and obviously if you enable small icons too. Otherwise show a screenshot, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeepItSimpleEngineer</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-26185</link>
		<dc:creator>KeepItSimpleEngineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-26185</guid>
		<description>First: Great work, great job…

I run Firefox 3.5.3 using Qute 4.0.1 on Windows XP % Windows XP x64.

On x64, the icons match those shown on http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/comparison.png

On the 32bit XP, the Back &amp; Forward icons are different.

Not really a problem, just curious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First: Great work, great job…</p>
<p>I run Firefox 3.5.3 using Qute 4.0.1 on Windows XP % Windows XP x64.</p>
<p>On x64, the icons match those shown on <a href="http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/comparison.png" rel="nofollow">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/comparison.png</a></p>
<p>On the 32bit XP, the Back &amp; Forward icons are different.</p>
<p>Not really a problem, just curious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Time User</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-24671</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Time User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-24671</guid>
		<description>I have been using Cute since FireFox 1.0 and always liked it a lot. The new version 4 not so much. Could you make a FireFox version of the Cute 3.x icons? Reading above you would make a lot of people happy if you did ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Cute since FireFox 1.0 and always liked it a lot. The new version 4 not so much. Could you make a FireFox version of the Cute 3.x icons? Reading above you would make a lot of people happy if you did &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Guy</title>
		<link>http://arvidaxelsson.se/2009/05/01/qute-4/comment-page-1/#comment-23572</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arvidaxelsson.se/blog/?p=48#comment-23572</guid>
		<description>I really dislike this new theme. The older classic was MUCH better. I have found the classic one that somebody else put up and am using that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dislike this new theme. The older classic was MUCH better. I have found the classic one that somebody else put up and am using that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

